Recommended EGCS Studies

SINTEF, Norway (2024), Data to be used for the calculation of representative emission factors of discharge water from EGCS (PPR 12/7/1, PPR 12/7/2,and PPR 12 INF.11)

Three papers providing: lab analysis of 99+146 ship samples taken from 12 ships per ISO standards and proposing standard calculation method for emission factors; consideration of the origin of elevated copper and zinc readings from sea chests; and a SINTEF QA review of emissions calculations.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Uses 99 directly gathered inlet water samples and 146 discharge samples to support the calculation of emission factors, establishing a practical method and resultant set of credible emission factors.

Carnival Corporation, DNVGL (2019), Compilation and Assessment of Lab Samples from EGCS Washwater Discharges on Carnival Ships (MEPC 74/INF.27)

Compares laboratory analysis of 281 EGCS washwater samples from 53 ships in global operations with major national and international water quality standards

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Used standard US EPA sampling and lab analysis protocols, analyzed for 54 parameters: washwater met all regulatory and major national/international standards, including WHO drinking water and EU WFD Environmental Quality Standards (EQS).

New Zealand (2022), Environmental risk assessment of discharges from exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) on ships in Aotearoa, New Zealand (PPR 9/10/3)

Literature review and modeling to assess risk of EGCS discharges, includes 11 locations based on shipping activity and proximity to sensitive ecological areas. Estimates high concentrations of discharges and uses MAMPEC for end fates.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Scrubber discharges are expected to have negligible effects in shipping lanes and in Milford Sound, and low to moderate risks of potential effects in select ports

Batley, Kidd, et al, CSIRO (2022), Assessing the Cumulative Effects of Washwater Discharges from Ships’ Open-Loop Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems on a Receiving Ecosystem (Australian Maritime Safety Administration)

Long-term ecosystem impacts of open-loop EGCS washwater discharges in a harbour port modelled and evaluated, with copper identified as a limiting contaminant. A 3D hydrodynamic and advection-dispersion model was used to evaluate the mixing and accumulation of effluent and contaminants from EGCS discharges over time from ships, using a conservative worst case scenario.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Modeling of long-term impacts of shipping washwater contaminants on harbour ecosystem health indicate that the EGCS washwater contaminant inputs will make a negligible contribution to any exceedance of water quality guideline values (WQGV) and have negligible impacts on harbour ecosystem health.

Linders, et al GESAMP (2019), Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems: a roadmap to risk assessments (PPR 7/INF.23)

The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP) Task Team on EGCS was convened by MEPC to provide an opinion on the potential environmental and public health effects of EGCS effluent.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Ecotoxicity: Found only 1 of 10 studies evaluated was using standard ISO or USEPA methods/protocols, with no adverse effects. Concluded that any effects would likely be from washwater pH, though sufficiently mitigated by normal seawater dilution.

CESA (2019), Study report on analyses of water samples from exhaust gas cleaning systems (MEPC 73/INF.5)

Reports on the analysis of 238 samples of scrubber overboard discharges and of seawater from 20 vessels in the Baltic and North Sea ECAs and two vessels in the Mediterranean in a joint campaign run by EGCSA and Euroshore.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Substantial direct sampling dataset, test procedures generally aligned with MEPC.1/Circ.899. The toxic metals (lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic) were largely undetected. Some nitrates were detected, at levels well below IMO limits, but nitrites were undetected.

Faber, et al, CE Delft (2019), The impacts of EGCS washwater discharges on port water and sediment (PPR 7/INF.18)

Compares empirical data from almost 300 washwater samples to EU WFD water quality standards and evaluates the impacts of open loop EGCS on water and sediments in several N. European modelled ports.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

For most ports and substances, the increase in concentrations is less than 0.1% of the limit values in the new EQS standards, easily meeting EU WFD water quality standards. Also, accumulation in sediment over decades remains a small percentile of the limits.

Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2012), Assessment of possible impacts of scrubber water discharges on the marine environment (BLG 17/INF.3)

Evaluates risk to the marine environment from metals, PAH’s and reduced pH discharges in high traffic areas of the Kattegat and Bight of Aarhus.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Modeling and comparison with EU EQS show EGCS discharge levels of metals/PAH’s to be orders of magnitude below the levels of ecological concern, and with negligible risks from acidic discharges.

Botnen, et al (1991), Field benthic survey and sampling evaluating environmental impact of Mongstad scrubber discharges

a) Botnen, et al (1991), Field benthic survey and sampling evaluating environmental impact of Mongstad scrubber discharges
b) Nyman & Tokerud (1991), Mongstad seawater scrubber first year of operation, Oil and Gas Journal
c) Johansen, Heggoy (2009), Monitoring of marine biological conditions at Statoil’s production facilities at Mongstad in 2009

These reports provide results from on-site surveys, which have been regularly conducted since 1990, with water and marine plant and animal sampling and sample analysis from around the discharge point of the seawater scrubb

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

No significant changes in the animal and plant life at Mongstad have been registered that can attributed to the operation of the facilities. The environment at the bottom stations is still considered good; the benthic fauna in March 2009 remains very rich in species as before and the fauna composition was relatively similar to that as before. The concentrations of oil hydrocarbons in the sediment were low and have decreased to the same level as in 2000. The content of most aromatic hydrocarbons was also still low in sediment. The concentrations of heavy metals in mussels were generally low.

Stathatou, MIT, Georgia Tech, LIberia (2025), Marine scrubbers vs. low sulphur fuels: a comprehensive well-to-wake life cycle assessment supported by measurements aboard on ocean-going ship (IMO PPR 12/INF.8)

Marine scrubbers vs low-sulphur fuels: A comprehensive well-to-wake life cycle assessment supported by measurements aboard an ocean-going ship to assess environmental impacts.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Finds that the Well-to-Tank impacts of HFO+ECGS were lower than MGO or VLSFO across all categories, including CO2: also, no risk of eutrophication and no likely adverse effects from EGCS discharges on receiving water bodies and ecosystems.

Brasil, CLS (2024), Environmental impact assessment study of exhaust gas cleaning system effluent discharges in the Port of Tubarão, Brazil (IMO PPR 12/INF.9)

Risk assessment used discharge water sample analysis and computational modeling to measure the ecological impacts of EGCS used by ships while traveling the Asia/Brazil route, as well as berthed or navigating through the Port of Tubarão in Brazil.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Models at different power levels found accumulations of metals in the water column and sediments were well under limits, and that EGCS discharges may be safely carried out without violating national water or sediment standards.

Word, et al (2024), Puget Sound Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) Washwater Ecological Risk Assessment, (IMO MEPC 81/INF.38)

Comprehensive assessment by Oregon State University and research group EcoAnalysts; washwater samples were gathered from 6 ships transiting Puget Sound and lab analysis and WET testing were conducted using standard US EPA/ISO methods per IMO Guidelines.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Combined chemical analysis, comparison to water quality standards, predictive models for PAH’s, WET testing, and dispersion modeling for both port and transits scenarios found the risk was very low in Puget Sound, with an RCR < 1.

Lim, et al, (2023), Environmental Risk Assessment of Discharge Water from Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (Korea Testing and Research Center)

Installed and operated a test open loop EGCS unit to measure and evaluate components of the discharge water, using standard ISO and US EPA protocols.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

In the environmental risk assessment, phenanthrene was judged as a persistent bioaccumulative and toxic substance, but the environmental risk is low as there were no substances with RCR values > 1. In summary, the environmental risk posed by open-loop EGCS discharge water is not considered high.

Danish Hydraulics Institute (2022), Ecotoxicity testing and risk assessment of wash water from open loop scrubbers, (IMO PPR 9/INF.8)

WET testing of marine organisms using EGCS discharge water samples from 4 ships operating in N.Europe, using generally accepted methods and IMO guidelines, and arriving at a risk characterization ratio. Used conservative assumptions to model three restrictive environments.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Analysis from MAMPEC modeling and WET testing found a risk characterization ratio (RCR) of < 1, meaning risk to the marine environment is considered acceptable (i.e. negligible).

Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2018), Report by the expert board for the environmental impact assessment of discharge water from scrubbers (IMO MEPC 74/INF.24)

Japanese Government evaluated both short and long-term environmental risks caused by discharge water from EGCS to the marine environment, conducting WET testing aligned with MEPC Guidance and using actual scrubber washwater.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Concludes that the discharge water cannot cause unacceptable effects to the marine environment, aquatic organisms, or marine water quality. Finds that there is no scientific justification for restricting open loop EGCS use.

Genitsaris, et al, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2025), Do coastal bacterioplankton communities hold the molecular key to the rapid biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from shipping scrubber effluent?

Investigates whether natural coastal bacterioplankton communities can rapidly biodegrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and alkylated PAHs present in scrubber effluent discharged from ships.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

PEC/PNEC, field validation, RCR applied.
Finds significant effects on PAH reduction from microbes; rapid biodegradation of PAH by native bacterioplankton communities removed over 85% of PAHs and alkyl-PAHs within 3 days. Further offshore reduction was slower, with 50% reduction in 6 days.

Kourkoutmani, et al, University of Athens (2025), Effects from maritime scrubber effluent on coastal metazooplankton

Evaluates how open-loop EGCS discharge impacts natural metazooplankton communities (vs. single species) particularly copepods in a coastal Mediterranean setting. Two exposure scenarios, a low and a high scrubber discharge (1% and 10% dilution) were considered.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

High exposure scenario showed some effects; however the low exposure scenario showed no effects on copepod development or abundance, supporting the conclusion that typical dilution scenarios in open waters pose negligible risk under real-world conditions.

Faber, et al, CE Delft (2020), Comparison of CO2 emissions of MARPOL Annex VI compliance options in 2020

A fully integrated comparison of CO2 emissions conducted on a well-to-wake (lifecycle) basis, with all GHG emissions over the lifecycle of compliance options (EGCS /HFO, VLSFO, & MGO) considered.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Found that due to the typical refining and desulphurization processes producing low sulphur fuels, that the use of EGCS plus heavy fuel oil (HFO) produces significantly lower CO2 emissions to atmosphere than using very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) or marine gasoil (MGO).

Di Natale, Carotenuto, Universita di Napoli (2015), Particulate matter in marine diesel engine exhausts: Emissions and control strategies.

Describes marine diesel engine exhaust components and various particulate types, sizes and effects on health, and the effectiveness of various reduction techniques, including fuel efficiency measures, fuel types, WIFE, EGCS, WESP, DPF’s (diesel particulate filters) and DOC’s (diesel oxidation catalysts.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

Both the use of low sulphur fuels and EGCS proved to be effective in reducing PM with size as low as 500 nm. Specific PM emissions were generally higher for IFO/HFO than for MGO; however, for the smallest size-fraction measured MGO was higher. Soot fractions of EC and OM could not be reduced by changing the sulphur level in the diesel fuels.

Fridell, Salo (2014), Measurements of abatement of particles and exhaust gases in a marine gas scrubber, (Journal of Engineering for the Marine Environment)

Conducts measurements of exhaust gases and particulates from a marine engine equipped with an open-loop scrubber using seawater for SO2 abatement, reducing SO2 to levels corresponding to IMO requirements of <.01% of sulphur in fuel.

Meets 2022 MEPC.1/Circ.899?
Key Findings

The scrubber reduces particulates by mass by 75%, with the total particle number reduced by about 92% and the solid fraction by 48%. This reduction of PM’s is of the same order as what is obtained with a switch of fuels from HFO to MGO.
PAH’s are also significantly reduced.